Russell’s eloquence so right again. Elections and campaign “promises”, regardless of winning party, have nil effect on administration post-election major and critical subjects such as International actions, national debt, violations of citizen rights, etc. Campaign “promises” are no more than hooks for party loyalists and then effectively forgotten.
---------------------------------------
Our current crisis of ‘programmed’ enormous increases in all-cause sudden deaths is demonstrable of a well orchestrated centralized strategy of control over the masses.
---------------------------------------
Political parties, when followed as if they were religions, facilitate implementation of such a strategy, for it’s only necessary to control two groups, each which demand internal loyalty, rather than a mass of independent individuals. Understand? Support grouping; facilitate control.
---------------------------------------
George Washington was firmly set against political parties. Here are just couple excerpts on subject from his Fairwell Address (Sept 17, 1796):
---------------------------------------
“I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the state, ... Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you, in the most solemn manner, against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally ... This spirit ... in those of the popular form it is seen in its greatest rankness ...”
--------------------------------------
“It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration; it agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments, occasionally, riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence
and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself, through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.”
---------------------------------
And the “another” of last sentence is not limited to another nation, but also a set of highly financed individuals.
You are right, Russell. And I wonder if there are enough brave, independent, intelligent people who can change this uni-party nightmare. We’ve seen how people we trusted in medicine turned on us to keep their jobs and even punish patients who dared to question. If you do question anything especially vaccines of any kind doctors are now ‘firing’ patients….so speak your beliefs and be punished. How do we fight that?
What I did was leave the country. I saw an intractible, illegitimate system that ruled with an iron fist in a velvet glove, that had abused the citizenry and maintained its dominance through subterfuge for over 150 years, and realized I couldn't beat that system no matter what I did or how I tried, so I chose not to live under its rule. Alas, the predators are now global, so even from a distance nobody is safe long term unless the majority refuse to comply. Mexico, where I live, isn't big on compliance with globalist agendas, thank God. But one never knows how that might eventually change.
I read The Occult Technology of Power by Alpine Enterprises. That book, published in 1973, lays out how the world is really run. Today, I read this article by you. It lays out how the world is really run. Good job.
Russell’s eloquence so right again. Elections and campaign “promises”, regardless of winning party, have nil effect on administration post-election major and critical subjects such as International actions, national debt, violations of citizen rights, etc. Campaign “promises” are no more than hooks for party loyalists and then effectively forgotten.
---------------------------------------
Our current crisis of ‘programmed’ enormous increases in all-cause sudden deaths is demonstrable of a well orchestrated centralized strategy of control over the masses.
---------------------------------------
Political parties, when followed as if they were religions, facilitate implementation of such a strategy, for it’s only necessary to control two groups, each which demand internal loyalty, rather than a mass of independent individuals. Understand? Support grouping; facilitate control.
---------------------------------------
George Washington was firmly set against political parties. Here are just couple excerpts on subject from his Fairwell Address (Sept 17, 1796):
---------------------------------------
“I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the state, ... Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you, in the most solemn manner, against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally ... This spirit ... in those of the popular form it is seen in its greatest rankness ...”
--------------------------------------
“It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration; it agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments, occasionally, riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence
and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself, through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.”
---------------------------------
And the “another” of last sentence is not limited to another nation, but also a set of highly financed individuals.
You are right, Russell. And I wonder if there are enough brave, independent, intelligent people who can change this uni-party nightmare. We’ve seen how people we trusted in medicine turned on us to keep their jobs and even punish patients who dared to question. If you do question anything especially vaccines of any kind doctors are now ‘firing’ patients….so speak your beliefs and be punished. How do we fight that?
What I did was leave the country. I saw an intractible, illegitimate system that ruled with an iron fist in a velvet glove, that had abused the citizenry and maintained its dominance through subterfuge for over 150 years, and realized I couldn't beat that system no matter what I did or how I tried, so I chose not to live under its rule. Alas, the predators are now global, so even from a distance nobody is safe long term unless the majority refuse to comply. Mexico, where I live, isn't big on compliance with globalist agendas, thank God. But one never knows how that might eventually change.
It's a uniparty, fer sure. Orwell was so prescient. We're living the 1984 playbook.
I read The Occult Technology of Power by Alpine Enterprises. That book, published in 1973, lays out how the world is really run. Today, I read this article by you. It lays out how the world is really run. Good job.