I think the linked article is wrong when it claims there were 104 miscarriages in a total of 127 pregnancies. Those 104 were out of a much larger group of 827 completed pregnancies, even if the miscarriages took place primarily during the first trimester (which they always do!) and many participants were only vaccinated in the 2nd or 3d trimester - which doesn't mean that the miscarriage was caused by the vaccination as they seem to imply. I don't know where the number of 127 came from, I can't find it in the original NEJM publication.
I thought 4 miscarriages out of 5 pregnancies was shockingly high, until I read this article: www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/322634. Apparently up to 75% of pregnancies end in a miscarriage before the woman even knows that she is pregnant!
Obviously, they couldn't be counting "unknown" pregnancies, given they were unknown, and thus their termination was also unknown. So I think we have to assume that we are talking weeks 5-20, in which case 4 out of 5 is extremely alarming.
See my comment above. Stated plainly, of those who received the jab in their first or second trimester, 4 out of 5 aborted. Those who didn't receive the jab until their third trimester obviously shouldn't be included in the cohort of those who did receive it in the first and second, as they are apples and oranges.
Your link says this: A total of 35,691 v-safe participants 16 to 54 years of age identified as pregnant. Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons than among nonpregnant women, whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic. Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).
Conclusions: Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.
Yes, reading what you just wrote, most of those who had a live birth weren't vaxxed in their first or second trimester - they were vaxxed in their third trimester. So it would have been impossible for them to have aborted in their first and second, as they were already past that when they got the jab at the same time as those who got it in their first and second, who did abort at a 4 out of 5 rate. Including those who ALREADY WERE PAST THE FIRST TWO TRIMESTERS when they received the jab, in the numbers, is either grossly incompetent, or is designed to trick people who can't fathom why someone who as already at third trimester when they got the jab didn't abort before the study started.
It is nice of such a large cohort to be part of the experimental trial group, willing to sacrifice their pregnancy in order to get more data. I'm sure that risk was explained to them before getting the shot, right?
This article brings up many issues. Rigged figures – shameless and shameful, have characterised the whole ‘event’. Then there is the gullibility of a public who ignored the history of developing countries’ children being used as experimental material – now it’s our turn. We have an arrogance that justifies a contempt for life and the casual disposal of such – the banality of evil. And, of course, we will have the twisted mental processes to justify the above – saving the planet, blah blah blah - without any realisation that all of these actions will have appropriate consequences for the perpetrators as well as the victims.
(first 20 weeks, not months)
I think the linked article is wrong when it claims there were 104 miscarriages in a total of 127 pregnancies. Those 104 were out of a much larger group of 827 completed pregnancies, even if the miscarriages took place primarily during the first trimester (which they always do!) and many participants were only vaccinated in the 2nd or 3d trimester - which doesn't mean that the miscarriage was caused by the vaccination as they seem to imply. I don't know where the number of 127 came from, I can't find it in the original NEJM publication.
I thought 4 miscarriages out of 5 pregnancies was shockingly high, until I read this article: www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/322634. Apparently up to 75% of pregnancies end in a miscarriage before the woman even knows that she is pregnant!
Obviously, they couldn't be counting "unknown" pregnancies, given they were unknown, and thus their termination was also unknown. So I think we have to assume that we are talking weeks 5-20, in which case 4 out of 5 is extremely alarming.
See my comment above. Stated plainly, of those who received the jab in their first or second trimester, 4 out of 5 aborted. Those who didn't receive the jab until their third trimester obviously shouldn't be included in the cohort of those who did receive it in the first and second, as they are apples and oranges.
That is explained in the article.
Your link says this: A total of 35,691 v-safe participants 16 to 54 years of age identified as pregnant. Injection-site pain was reported more frequently among pregnant persons than among nonpregnant women, whereas headache, myalgia, chills, and fever were reported less frequently. Among 3958 participants enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry, 827 had a completed pregnancy, of which 115 (13.9%) resulted in a pregnancy loss and 712 (86.1%) resulted in a live birth (mostly among participants with vaccination in the third trimester). Adverse neonatal outcomes included preterm birth (in 9.4%) and small size for gestational age (in 3.2%); no neonatal deaths were reported. Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic. Among 221 pregnancy-related adverse events reported to the VAERS, the most frequently reported event was spontaneous abortion (46 cases).
Conclusions: Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines. However, more longitudinal follow-up, including follow-up of large numbers of women vaccinated earlier in pregnancy, is necessary to inform maternal, pregnancy, and infant outcomes.
Yes, reading what you just wrote, most of those who had a live birth weren't vaxxed in their first or second trimester - they were vaxxed in their third trimester. So it would have been impossible for them to have aborted in their first and second, as they were already past that when they got the jab at the same time as those who got it in their first and second, who did abort at a 4 out of 5 rate. Including those who ALREADY WERE PAST THE FIRST TWO TRIMESTERS when they received the jab, in the numbers, is either grossly incompetent, or is designed to trick people who can't fathom why someone who as already at third trimester when they got the jab didn't abort before the study started.
It is nice of such a large cohort to be part of the experimental trial group, willing to sacrifice their pregnancy in order to get more data. I'm sure that risk was explained to them before getting the shot, right?
Thanks, Russell.
This article brings up many issues. Rigged figures – shameless and shameful, have characterised the whole ‘event’. Then there is the gullibility of a public who ignored the history of developing countries’ children being used as experimental material – now it’s our turn. We have an arrogance that justifies a contempt for life and the casual disposal of such – the banality of evil. And, of course, we will have the twisted mental processes to justify the above – saving the planet, blah blah blah - without any realisation that all of these actions will have appropriate consequences for the perpetrators as well as the victims.