Let’s play a game. The name of the game is eugenics. Where you want to rid your economy of the “useless eaters” - the aged who have paid into your scam entitlements systems their entire lives and expect to get the benefits they were promised (not realizing you stole their money over the last 40 years so you can’t give them anything), those too dim to be usefully productive (who will be replaced by a robotic arm or a screen within the next 5-10 years), the breeders who just churn out more of the same detritus. Hundreds of millions of them in just the US, and a billion or more across all the developed economies where you own the banks responsible for the theft (because you didn’t limit your looting and pillaging to the US and those other members of the Anglo-American empire also have hefty entitlements and the same demographic cliff).
You need all these creditors gone. Because otherwise they’re going to want to know who stole their money and lied to them for generations, and that would mean they’ll come for you with pitchforks and guillotines. Bad for you. So the choice is pretty clear.
They need killin’.
But how do you do it? How do you get 50, 60, 70% of the developed nations’ populations to expire in a timely fashion?
Hey. I know. You contrive a weak bio-weapon and hype it like it’s the frigging plague, with all the panic designed to achieve two short-term objectives: scare the pants off everyone so they will willingly abdicate their rights and tolerate de facto martial law tactics, and prepare them psychologically to be willing to do anything to get their puny rights back - even get injected with experimental gene therapies with unknown safety outcomes.
The kicker is the injection is designed to kill a few almost instantly, but still more from opportunistic infections and “variants” (the common cold is a coronavirus “variant”, let’s not forget) due to antibody dependant enhancement, and even more from immunological problems over the longer term (exactly as HIV kills some quickly, others over a few months, still others over years) and cancer (which takes years to manifest sufficiently to off them).
And the best part? You can claim that you “didn’t know” that could happen! Plausible deniability!!! That way the rifles and machetes don’t come out. You were just doing your job, just trying to help! Nobody could have foreseen the awful outcome of the best of intentions.
Of course, if there are readily available dirt cheap drugs that can knock the virus out cold, you need to demonize them or simply ignore all the data that shows they turn this into a nothingburger, but you control the media and the watchdogs, so that’s easy - no matter what evidence is presented, you declare it insufficient, and demand more time to study matters so your experimental gene therapies can disseminate and do their important work.
So what would that scenario look like in the early stages of the “fourth Reich?” Er…I mean, the “fourth wave”?
Well, you would expect to see the fatality rate for the vaxxed be massively higher than the unvaxxed when a “new variant” presents itself.
Thank goodness that’s mediocre speculative fiction, right?
Oh. Wait. This just in. That is precisely what they are seeing in the UK. This article analyzes the numbers and explains in detail why your odds of dying if you’re fully vaxxed are 885% higher than if you’re unvaxxed and you encounter a “new variant” that is now the fastest spreading version. With links to the government source docs. Which everyone in the mainstream seems unable to report on, or to grasp, just as they are unable to report on the tens of thousands of deaths being reported from the vax (to the VAERS and the EU equivalent data base). Apparently if your pay depends on you being blind to the obvious, you suddenly can’t see.
What are the odds?
Talking of eugenics - Midazolam – caring or killing?
https://wp.me/poEgZ-7mk
https://youtu.be/5kvJgAMDeWg