Uh Oh. A Comprehensive Research Analysis on Why mRNA Is Literally a Killer
The fact checkers are sure to go batshit over this scholarly analysis by an MIT Senior Research Scientist that concludes you would do less harm to yourself using dirty needles whilst chain smoking lucky strikes and knocking back a fistful of meth every morning than going anywhere near an mRNA injection. “Lacks Context” or some such, you can absolutely bet.
Read it and weep.
This scientific analysis of the mRNA experimental chemicals being mandated into our bodies has all the subtlety of a nuclear explosion and can be expected to cause spastic conniptions and immediate knee jerk launching of all cancel weapons from the narrative folks. Get the last sentence below. Thanks to Russell for the forward.
Extract from the Abstract:
“We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances are shown to have a potentially direct causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell’s palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, increased tumorigenesis, and DNA damage. We show evidence from adverse event reports in the VAERS database supporting our hypothesis.
“We believe a comprehensive risk/benefit assessment of the mRNA vaccines
excludes them as positive contributors to public health.”
Robert Malone's been saying this (I THINK) as well. He's that guy who was booted from Twitter despite him having a prominent role of mRNA's development in the first place. He also translates the academic jargon into layspeak pretty well. He's on substack, and I encourage everyone to subscribe to him.
(Now waiting for Russell to tell me that he went scuba diving w/ Malone while Matt Taibbi and Joe Rogan stayed ashore broiling lobster tails or somethin'... LOL)