Speaking Truth To Power Is Dangerous

I just got banned for three days from Facebook for a post in which I stated that the censorship and unscientific ideology that underscores the official narrative and government responses is not in any way logical, rational, or scientific. It is in fact reminiscent of the propaganda that was used so effectively by the National Socialist Party in Germany in the 1930’s. The Nazis understood that it only took a few months of propaganda to brainwash those subjected to it. The West has been relentlessly propagandized for 18 months. I bought the BS in the first months, at least insomuch as I believe the models by “the best experts money can buy”…until they turned out to be completely wrong. Then I started questioning the narrative, and slowly began to realize that what we were witnessing was the biggest Psy-Op in history, with the collusion of bankers, big pharma, governments, the medical profession, and the regulators who are supposed to protect us from all of them.

Facebook apparently feels that sort of observation goes against their community standards. Because God help it if you question an official narrative citing official links and source materials. Some things aren’t done. Some things are too dangerous to allow to stand. So best to hide them away where the dim can’t be swayed by dangerous words from a bestselling author and social commentator. Best to shut that shit right down so only the approved voices remain. Freedom of speech so long as it is the acceptable message allowed by the arbiters of “community standards.”

I opined that there was no point in arguing with the pro-shot folks because they’re irrationally defending an illogical ideology, not arguing facts and data. If you cite something they dislike, they simply ignore it. Because again, if you’re in a cult the prevailing wisdom is to avoid any rhetoric that calls into question the cult’s beliefs. It was very much like that with Russiagate, and it seems the same folks have largely pivoted with the propaganda and now hold deepseated beliefs based on baffling bullshit that is provably wrong.

Never gave them pause before, so obviously pointing it out doesn’t give them pause now.

Anyhow, I will be absent from FB for three days for daring to question the official narrative. This will give me time to make some progress on DAN, as it takes many hours a day to review all the articles and vids I’m sent in order to research the latest developments in the COVID Psy-Op, whether it’s German cops punching women and children for peacefully protesting arbitrary and unscientific lockdowns and masking regulations, or Australian soldiers enforcing the government’s mandates on its citizens (you are subjects and they are rulers, so do what they say or else), or Pfizer and Moderna eliminating the control groups in their long term safety studies so there is no way to gauge the danger or the efficacy of the products that are making them tens of billions per quarter. That takes a ton of time, so I can now focus on a story of surviving humans in a dystopian future where a man-made virus and a financial apocalypse destroy civilization.

I thought I was writing fiction, not tomorrow’s news. Oh well. Go figure.

Spread the word. But don’t ruffle any feathers or the arbitrary censors will make you a target, too.

Here is the post that got me banned: “I have decided not to argue with those who are pushing an ideology, not science, with their pro-experimental jab stance.

Science would say that if you have tens of thousands of deaths from a novel vaccine, you would stop issuing it to ascertain what is going on. Science would dictate that you not vaccinate kids who have literally zero chance of dying of the virus. Science would dictate that you have a control group in your long term evaluation (both Pfizer and Moderna inoculated their control group too, so now there is no scientific way to measure the positive or negative effects of the shots longer than the few months of the first part of the study - they eliminated the controls even though the study goes on for another two years). Science would dictate that you would be extremely hesitant and weigh the risks of the jab against the risk of severe illness or death, not recommend the jab for everyone, assuring them it's safe when there is no long term safety data.

Ideology is advanced through propaganda. The Nazis understood that it only took a few months of propaganda to brainwash a population. They were enormously effective at it. We have seen relentless propaganda for 18 months. No wonder so many are "defending" their ideology instead of analyzing the data. They have been inculcated into being emotionally attached to the ideology, at which point rationality goes out the window. This is why so many believe that the vax prevents spread or infection when it provably doesn't. They prefer proclamations from propagandists to evaluating actual data. It is cult-like, and it is a cult of the brainwashed, and reasoning with cult members simply doesn't work.

We will all get to see real time the result of this global medical experiment taking place without informed consent. Folks just hand wave away that medical experimentation without informed consent violates the Nuremberg Code. "What do Nazi war crimes have to do with us?" they reason. Turns out just about everything. But just as the Germans didn't see their government's atrocities as loathsome until far too late, so too do many not see their own government's atrocities against their own citizens as repellent.

History indeed repeats, especially when you have many of the same ideologies in play.

We will all get to see whether my concerns are correct or not in a year. But recall my concerns a year ago over vaccine passports and coerced vaccination, which seemed impossible then, are now reality.

That doesn't bode well.”