In News That Will Surprise No One, FB Claims "Fact Checking" Is Stating An Opinion, Not Stating Actual Fact

So when you’re banned for posting content “fact checkers” have deemed false or lacking context, they aren’t actually saying they’re false or misleading, they are saying they disagree with the facts or your statement thereof. So basically anything some fact checker dislikes for any reason (like political pursuasion or because they’re being paid by big pharma or whatnot), while stated as though definitive fact, is in fact the opinion of an $7 per hour grunt in Bangalore or Shanghai or a lobbying firm in Washington, and not anything resembling actual debunking. It’s a feeling. An opinion. And you know that saying about opinions and assholes…

You can read FB’s own admission here. It is definitive that its fact checkers are in reality just bullies with different opinions who have been given leeway to restrict speech if they disagree with something you post. This perfectly explains why certified authorities with germane credentials and expertise can be banned for stating actual scientific fact, or their statements differed with by someone with a high school education and English as their third language, no doubt reading from a list of topics that differ from the official narrative. It’s censorship, plain and simple, for stating uncomfortable truths that threaten the powerful and the oppressive.