It should be obvious to most by now that the COVID response and the media’s role in it has nothing to do with public health, and everything to do with control and money.
The science is clear that neither lockdowns nor masking had any noticeable effect on the curves. We can look at country after country and see that. It isn’t contentious any longer - not after 18 months, where places that didn’t lock down or mask have the same curves as those that did, or where you cannot actually pick out on any of the graphs where masking and lockdowns were implemented based on the cases, hospitalizations, or deaths.
And yet those are the same techniques that are going to be continually used “for the good of society.” In other words, never mind what is effective from a scientific standpoint, we’ll keep doing what doesn’t work, and what has a massively negative social effect. Because it’s “better than nothing.”
No, it isn’t. Putting massive numbers of small and mid-sized businesses out of business for lockdowns that achieve nothing isn’t in fact better than nothing - it is markedly worse. Preventing folks from going to the hospital for care because of engineered panic isn’t better than nothing, it results in more deaths and sickness. Requiring folks wear masks when they do no good and there is voluminous data to show that they can cause active harm isn’t better than nothing.
This is all mind control. Recall that all of these measures were supposedly “temporary” - to “flatten the curve” and keep the hospitals from being overwhelmed. But now those “temporary, emergency measures” are stretching for over a year, and are being extended or reinstated as we speak. And yet they are ineffective.
From a public health standpoint, that is. From a psy-op vantage point, they are extremely effective at conditioning people to obey regardless of how illogical the order, to depersonalize by eliminating most of their recognizable face, to destroying their ability to self-determine by operating their own business or make a living. From that standpoint, the measures make perfect sense. And to drive them into being willing to participate in a mass experiment with an untested gene therapy that is killing people by the tens of thousands. In that regard, the response has been a winner.
As an example of what we are faced with, I am linking a vid from Canada, where a health wonk states clearly that the anti-gathering (lockdown) measures are not only for public health, but to PREVENT DANGEROUS INFORMATION FROM BEING EXCHANGED by the wrong thinking among us. Wrong thinking being anything that conflicts with the official narrative that ignores everything we’ve learned about medicine in the last 100 years in terms of preventive or early care, and amounts to “do nothing until your lips are turning blue and you need a ventilator, and then come in and we’ll see if we have a spot in the dying ward for you.”
The true purpose slips out. It is to control what is said, and by whom. This is directly out of Orwell’s 1984. I couldn’t make it up. Unelected bureaucrats are crafting a future for humanity wherein the population will be dictated to by these self-selected gurus, and will only be allowed to do things that don’t pose a danger to the state’s complete control over them. They are your masters, you their servants, and you won’t be allowed to do anything that challenges their growing stranglehold over you.
Watch the clip if you don’t believe me. And the UK is doing the same thing, extending the supposed “emergency measures” for another month or ten, because, you guessed it, “dangerous new variant spread.” Which will be blamed on the unvaccinated, of course. The drive being to force everyone to vax, “for the good of society,” regardless of how that is working in places like Israel, which is the most vaxxed nation in the world, and is going back into lockdown again because vaxxing during a pandemic is a reckless, dangerous idea that has been warned against by top experts because it will encourage gain of function into more contagious variants, exactly as is being seen.
These top experts are now censored and ignored because their “dangerous information” can’t be allowed to spread lest the masses start to question the narrative. As have the numerous physicians who have advocated life-saving interventions like Ivermectin. Because the only solution to the deadly virus that only kills 0.18% or less is of course to obey, and get the shot that is going to make nearly bankrupt pharma giants like Pfizer hundreds of billions. Sheer madness and as anti-scientific as it gets. The very nature of science is one of open discussion of hypotheses and possible treatment options, not censorship of it. This is so dystopian as to leave me speechless.
Almost, anyway.
If I’m going to be controlled, intimidated and probably terminated, I’d rather it be by a Genghis Khan figure rather than a third-rate little bureaucrat who isn’t even aware that he is third-rate.
Sorry, I can't think of anything else to say.