Current Pfizer Vaccine NOT Fully FDA Approved, And More Lies About Herd Immunity

This is a very important blog. Read it carefully, and then reread it so you can completely understand what it states in clear language.

Does it not give anyone pause that the establishment official narrative has shifted from 70% infected and recovered or vaccinated in order to reach herd immunity, and has now been moved to 90%, just this week, from Dr. Fauci and DiBlasio? Recall it was 60%, and then 70% and we can all return to normal. Now they are saying 90%, which means that young kids for whom COVID is a non-issue will need to get vaccinated in order for everyone to be safe.

90% is not based on any science I know of. It is pure invention. They simply moved the goalposts.

And they are coming for children for whom the vaccine is actively dangerous at a significant level, and for whom the vaccine is NOT APPROVED. Why isn’t it? Because the safety studies won’t be concluded for at least another two to three years. So they have NO DATA to suggest these shots for kids under 15 are safe. None. In fact, there is plentiful evidence that they are actively harmful. For the record, COVID poses quite literally no risk to kids of that target age. Under 15, there is statistically insignificant risk from COVID unless they are dying of leukemia or something.

Does it bother anyone that literally everything the official narrative has claimed has been proven to be false? Masks don’t work, but then suddenly do. Lockdowns will only be necessary for two weeks to “flatten the curve.” Herd immunity will be achieved when 60% of the population is immunized via vaccines or natural infection. Then 70% more recently. And now 90%, which means virtually everyone but kids under the age of six and a few outliers.

As an interesting aside, the FDA “approval” that the media reported with such glee is NOT FOR THE PFIZER VACCINE THAT IS CURRENTLY BEING DISTRIBUTED. Let that sink in. Read it again if you don’t understand it. That BioNTech “vaccine” is still being issued under emergency use, with its indemnification from lawsuits. IT IS NOT THE SAME THING in any legal sense (as the COMIRNATY vaccine), which is key. That currently distributed vaccine has Pfizer liable for zero adverse events or deaths. They lose that indemnification when they start distributing the new, fully approved vaccine.

To clarify, the approved vaccine is the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine, which is not being distributed to Americans (that I know of) - the BioNTech version is. So the approval is NOT for the currently distributed vaccine from Pfizer, which is the BioNTech. I repeat, the approved vaccine isn’t being shipped yet in any quantity in America. And it may never be. Pfizer is under no obligation to do so. But the media is conflating that “future” vaccine with the current one to fool people into believing the current Pfizer jab is “approved.” And so is the FDA - which pointed out that both the licensed Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine, and the existing vaccine are “legally distinct,” but states that their differences do not “impact safety or effectiveness.”

The media is pretending this is “just a name change.” It isn’t, or it wouldn’t be “legally distinct.”

Legally distinct. Let that bit of legalese sink in too. Legally distinct means it isn’t the same thing from a legal perspective, no matter what your favorite propaganda outlet claims.

Which means that the original, “legally distinct” vaccine is still issued under emergency use, with all its immunity from liability, and the newly named Comirnaty “legally distinct” vaccine is issued under full approval (even though for “safety and efficacy” they can be used interchangeably - BUT NOT IN A LEGAL SENSE AS IT PERTAINS TO LIABILITY).

Read that again if you didn’t understand it. “You can use that syringe with the blue stuff there, because it is about as safe and efficient as that one with the red stuff over there, but for the purposes of liability, IT ISN’T THE SAME THING AT ALL. So you takes your chances on that one, ha ha ha ha.”

To put it bluntly, the FDA approval is a legal cover so that the government can mandate vaccination, and approve corporations to mandate them, through rhetorical trickery that is basically a legalese sleight of hand they figure most are too dumb to catch. They can TRICK people into believing the FDA has “approved” the currently distributed Pfizer vax, when it hasn’t done any such thing. My hunch is Pfizer will never manufacture an “approved” vaccine that isn’t distributed under emergency use because that would set them up for liability that is waived under emergency use, and why would they want to do that when the EU and VAERS databases are through the roof on adverse events and deaths?

So this approval smacks of a politically motivated, not a scientifically based, bait and switch that it seems like the media has gone on vacation investigating, because if I can figure this out, so can the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times. And yet crickets.

The final question is of course why do the regulators, and the media, and the government, feel the need to lie to and trick the American public? The possible answers range from ominous to horrific, with none of them good.

Here is the FDA letter. The language cited is from page 2, footnote 8.